>>201
＞こっちは正式な文献を提示して説明したんで、何１つ間違ったことは言っていない。

その提示したとやらの内容が全然足りない。だいたい一部分を故意に省略しているような引用なんて誠意がない。
関連する箇所を全部引用すると次の通り

ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (E)
5.1.2.2.1 Program startup
1 The function called at program startup is named main. The implementation declares no
prototype for this function. It shall be defined with a return type of int and with no
parameters:
int main(void) { /* ... */ }
or with two parameters (referred to here as argc and argv, though any names may be
used, as they are local to the function in which they are declared):
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { /* ... */ }
or equivalent;9) or in some other implementation-defined manner.
9) Thus, int can be replaced by a typedef name defined as int, or the type of argv can be written as
char ** argv, and so on.

6.7.5.3 Function declarators (including prototypes)
14 An identifier list declares only the identifiers of the parameters of the function. An empty
list in a function declarator that is part of a definition of that function specifies that the
function has no parameters. The empty list in a function declarator that is not part of a
definition of that function specifies that no information about the number or types of the
parameters is supplied.124)
124) See ‘‘future language directions’’ (6.11.6).
6.11.6 Function declarators
1 The use of function declarators with empty parentheses (not prototype-format parameter
type declarators) is an obsolescent feature.
6.11.7 Function definitions
1 The use of function definitions with separate parameter identifier and declaration lists
(not prototype-format parameter type and identifier declarators) is an obsolescent feature.