>>274
I understand. What you are saying is very likely to be the case, just
for you. This is the modern style, isn't it?

>>275
Logical structures of the statements may happen to be less important
than what we are going to claim that I believe. So I'd like you not to
imitate/follow me.

>>273
I'm now thinking about to respond to your point. Please give me your
"trip sequence", or otherwise, I cannot be serious.