> I still don't see this as an even remotely reasonable interpretation
> of the phrase "each of the above four boxes". It'd never stand up
> in a court of law - except in Wonderland, maybe. The use of the
> definite article implies that "the" four boxes in question must be
> *all* of the four inside one of the three larger boxes; and nothing
> in the wording of the problem even faintly suggests that any one of
> the three boxes is to be singled out from the others; so the count
> must include *all* four boxes in *each* of the three bigger boxes.
> There just isn't any latitude for another interpretation.
>
> --
> Angus Rodgers
> (angus_prune@ eats spam; reply to angusrod@)
> Contains mild peril



Now I think that YOU are quite right.



# By the way, what is the difference, if any, between the two family
names "Rogers"and "Rodgers"? Do You have the same origin ?

## L am asking the above question either/both to Mr/Dr Bud Rogers
or/and Mr/Dr Angus Rogders.

Thank You in advance. m(_ _)m